Facts and Numbers
Before starting to understand what the best
way for Africa to progress into the future regarding the use of its water is,
we must understand the past and especially the current situation there.
Therefore, I will try to answer the following questions in this post, focusing to an extent on Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda, who are hopfully quite representative for other countries in Africa:
How much water is used in Africa? What is
it used for? Who owns this water?
Numbers
and statistics
For data on domestic water use for the average consumer, the 1972 book Drawers ofWater by Gilbert F. White, David J. Bradley and Anne U. White and its sequel 2001 Drawers of Water II by John Thompson et al. provide much useful information on the changes in domestic water consumption in East Africa. The authors of the original Drawers of Water picked 16 sites in Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda, and recorded various statistics on domestic water usage for inhabitants of all economic backgrounds. The 2001 edition then revisited these sites and gave updates on these statistics, allowing a comparison between conditions in the late 60s and late 90s.
The research paints a gloomy picture of
progress. Mean per capita water use in urban areas has fallen from 98.7 to 54.9 litres per day,
present water infrastructure has “declined significantly” (Thompson et al., 2000) with only 20% of piped households having a 24h of water, and time spent collecting water has increased
from 27.9 to 91.7 minutes for people living in unpiped households. Also, urban water supply has been significantly
affected by the rise of kiosks and vendors, who in 1997 provided water to
almost 40% of piped households (ibid), up from zero in 1967.
While conditions were worsening, population
increased massively from 36 million to 82 million in the countries these
statistics were measured. This growth is not predicted to stop, with
Sub-Saharan Africa experiencing the highest urbanisation rate in the world for
the foreseeable future, and while at the moment ~35% of
Africans live in urban conditions, this is set to rise to 50% by 2040. (DosSantos et al., 2011)
Usage
A good, concise account of what water is
used for in Africa is given by Wada et al. (2011). As seen on Figure 1, across
the entire continent, 260.4 m3 of water per capita get withdrawn
annually, which is significantly lower than the values for Europe (537.8m3)
and North America (1307.5m3), and of this a very large proportion
(83.1%) is used in agriculture.
Population in 2000 (millions)
|
Total Freshwater Withdrawal (km3 yr−1)
|
Per Capita Withdrawal (m3capita−1 yr−1)
|
Withdrawal per Sector (%)
|
|||
Agriculture
|
Industry
|
Domestic
|
||||
Continents
|
||||||
Africa
|
818.7
|
213.2
|
260.4
|
83.1
|
4.3
|
12.6
|
Asia
|
3679.8
|
2294.8
|
623.6
|
84.9
|
7.2
|
7.9
|
Europe
|
729.2
|
392.2
|
537.8
|
29.3
|
48.5
|
22.2
|
North
America
|
476.1
|
622.5
|
1307.5
|
44.1
|
33.9
|
22.0
|
South
America
|
341.2
|
164.6
|
482.4
|
84.8
|
6.4
|
8.8
|
Oceania
|
28.7
|
26.3
|
916.4
|
64.9
|
10.4
|
24.7
|
GDP
per capita classes
|
||||||
Low
income countries
|
2203.2
|
1288.2
|
584.7
|
86.0
|
7.7
|
6.3
|
Middle
income countries
|
2961.7
|
1549.4
|
523.2
|
69.0
|
16.1
|
14.9
|
High
income countries
|
908.8
|
875.7
|
963.6
|
39.6
|
39.4
|
21.0
|
Global
|
6073.7
|
3713.7
|
611.4
|
68.6
|
18.1
|
13.3
|
Figure 1: Population and Water Withdrawal by Sector per Continent and
Classified by GDP per Capita for the Year 2000, adapted from Wada et al.
(2011)
Ownership
According to Thompson et al. (2000), who
base their research on data from Drawers
of Water I and II, “privatisation
of water and health services in East Africa has taken place on a grand scale since
the structural adjustment era of the 1980s, but not in ways that fit easily
with World Bank or IMF prescriptions.”
Further, “the links between the voluntary
sector and the state are becoming more, not less, important for service
provision. Significant parts of water and environmental health serives would
grind to a halt in Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda if voluntary agencies did not
have access to state-provided resources” while “donors play a growing political
and financial role in the water and health sectors. State services depend
increasingly on donor resources.” (ibid)
Thus, ownership of water in the domestic sector has generally been transferred from government and towards more neoliberal market actors, like private companies and the voluntary sector.
Conclusion
Looking at these facts, many possible
questions arise. Who is responsible for the apparent failure of domestic
infrastructure in the East African nations? To what extent was the large-scale privatisation
of water supply responsible for this, or was it actually failure on governmental
side that was at fault? How is continued urbanisation going to affect water
supply in the coming years?
According to the examined
literature, it appears that ‘privatisation’ is the most widely commented-on issue
related to domestic water consumption in Africa. Thus, in next week’s post, I
will look at privatisation in more depth, focusing on South Africa as a case study.
Hi Arnold. Good post with lots of detail and relevant examples. When looking at literature for this topic, I came across the problem that in some cases there was a lack of hydrological data which are at the root of many problems (see Oyebande 2001 for example). Did you come across this problem too? If so, what impact do you think this has on the reliability of available data?
ReplyDeleteDear Bailey,
DeleteThank you for your comment! You raise a really interesting point. Within the materials I was reading there is no direct mentioning by the author of any lack of hydrological data. However, what I was able to clearly make out from my readings is the loss of funds available to both scientific hydrologists and water governance (infrastructure etc), so clearly there is a connection here. In South Africa for example, government captial expenditure on the Department of Water Affairs and Forestry (DWAF) went "from $24 milion in 1982/3 to less than $5 million in 1992/3." This includes financing for hydrologists. This is most definitely worrying when thinking about the issue of data reliability.
I will let you know if I come across anything related to lacking hydrological data in the future.
Best,
Arnold